Skip to main content
Rehmann
Rehmann
Industries
Resources
About Us

Why Your Organization’s Retirement Plan Deserves a Second Look

November 4, 2026

Contributors: Bill Blank, AIF®, CPFA®, PPC™

The Basics 

  • Employer-sponsored retirement plans often go years without a meaningful review, even as costs, workforce needs, and investments  change. 
  • A retirement plan review helps plan sponsors confirm what’s working and uncover simple opportunities to improve fees, investments, design, and administration. 
  • Left unchecked, an outdated plan can increase costs, reduce employee engagement, and create unnecessary fiduciary risk. 
  • The good news: Most issues uncovered in a review are manageable and can be corrected without major disruption. 

 

Institutional Retirement Plans: Has Yours Evolved or Sat Untouched?
When was the last time anyone actually examined your organization’s retirement plan? Not glanced at it. Not assumed it was fine. Actually examined it. 

For many organizations, the honest answer is troubling.  

Maybe this situation sounds familiar: Your employer-sponsored retirement plan was set up years ago, the paperwork was filed, and everyone moved on. Meanwhile, operations grew, the workforce changed, fees quietly compounded, and the investment lineup has been underperforming. Yet the plan itself sat untouched, running on autopilot. 

If that sounds familiar, that’s a problem. But it’s one that a retirement plan review is designed to solve. 

The Committee Problem Nobody Talks About 

Here’s an uncomfortable truth: The people responsible for overseeing most employer-sponsored retirement plans aren’t retirement plan specialists. And they were never supposed to be. 

Retirement plan committees are typically made up of business owners or organization executives, HR leaders, and finance professionals — folks with plenty on their plates already. They’re not spending their days benchmarking fees or evaluating fund performance. That’s precisely why they hire an advisor. 

But this creates a subtle challenge. If you’re not a specialist yourself, how do you know whether you’re getting the expertise and value you’re paying your advisor for? How do you know if your plan is genuinely in good shape, or simply hasn’t been questioned? 

A plan review answers exactly that question. And the answer cuts one of two ways: 

  • Confirmation. Sometimes the conclusion is that the plan is healthy. Fees are reasonable, investments are appropriately monitored, providers are delivering, and the plan design aligns with what the organization and its employees need. That’s a genuinely valuable outcome, because it gives the committee confidence its plan is on track. 
  • Opportunity. Other times, the review surfaces things worth addressing. Note: These revelations aren’t mistakes to feel guilty about. They’re opportunities, and they’re usually easier to fix than people expect. 

Either way, you win. As the saying goes, a review isn’t about assuming something is wrong. It’s about making sure nothing is slipping through the cracks. 

What Happens When Nobody Looks 

The real danger isn’t discovering a problem during a review. It’s letting a problem fester because no one knew about it. 

When a retirement plan goes unexamined for years, the consequences accumulate quietly: 

  • Employees don’t understand or appreciate the benefit they’ve been given. 
  • The plan isn’t effective at actually helping people save for retirement. 
  • The plan does little to help attract and retain talent, which matters more than ever in a competitive labor market. 
  • The plan costs more than it should. 
  • The plan generates unnecessary fiduciary risk for the people responsible for overseeing it. 

None of these issues announce themselves. They typically compound in the background until something forces them into the open. A review flips that dynamic, turning unknown risks into known, navigable facts. 

The Five Places Problems Hide in Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plans 

When you dig into an employer-sponsored retirement plan, the same gaps tend to appear again and again. Here are the five areas worth scrutinizing most closely: 

1. Plan Design 

Plan design refers to the provisions that govern how an employer-sponsored plan runs, including eligibility rules and contribution structures. The trouble is that a plan designed for a business or organization 10 years ago rarely fits the business or organization as it looks today. 

Maybe the workforce has transformed. Maybe the original design was never properly aligned with the organization’s goals in the first place. A good review asks whether the design is genuinely helping the organization accomplish its objectives and serving participants well. 

2. Fees and Provider Value 

Fees are the obvious place to look, but value is the sharper lens. 

High fees aren’t automatically bad if they’re backed by services that justify them. Low fees aren’t automatically good if the plan is being underserved. What matters is alignment between what you pay and what you receive. 

The problem is that fee structures often go years without being revisited, even as the plan grows around them. Consider: 

  • A fee arrangement built for a company with 50 employees probably doesn’t make sense at 300 employees, especially if those are per-head fees. 
  • An asset-based fee structure that fit a $500,000 plan may be wrong for a $5 million plan. 
  • These shifts can happen in just a few years. 

Your goal isn’t simply finding the lowest price. It’s understanding what you’re paying for and whether those services justify the cost. 

3. The Investment Lineup 

Investment lineups get left behind more than you might think. Over time, investments can quietly underperform their peers, redundancies lead to concentration risk, and gaps that prevent proper diversification go unfilled. 

The root cause is usually the absence of a disciplined monitoring process. When a committee or a third party consistently tracks investment options and reports on them, the lineup stays current as the plan evolves. But without that discipline, investments can quietly drift. 

4. Administration and Operational Risk 

A great deal happens behind the scenes of an employer-sponsored retirement plan: payroll, eligibility, contributions, compliance testing,  mandatory participant communications, and filings. When any of these processes aren’t running efficiently, something can fall through the cracks, and operational errors carry real consequences. 

5. The Participant Experience 

This may be the most important area of all. A plan can do everything right on paper and still fail the people it’s meant to serve. 

If employees don’t understand the benefits, can’t navigate the website or app, or can’t figure out how to make the changes they know they should, they eventually stop trying. And from the employer’s perspective, there’s little worse than pouring resources into a benefit that employees never come to see as a meaningful part of their overall package. 

A thorough review examines the plan from both sides at once: Is it serving the organization’s needs? And is it serving the employees’ needs? 

Good News: The Fixes Are Usually Simple 

Here’s what surprises people most. The opportunities uncovered in a review are rarely giant, disruptive problems. More often, they’re straightforward changes that can materially improve the experience for both the employer and employees. 

An outdated design can be modernized. Fees can be renegotiated or restructured. An investment lineup can be refreshed. A clunky participant experience can be streamlined. None of this requires tearing the plan down and starting over. 

That’s the quiet power of a regular review: It can catch issues while they’re still small and easy to correct, long before they become expensive or risky. 

What a Good Review Actually Feels Like 

If the word “review” conjures images of endless document requests and high-pressure sales pitches, set that aside. A well-run plan review looks different. Here’s what you should expect: 

  • An easy lift for you. A capable advisor can glean a great deal from a small number of key plan documents and reports. The heavy analysis is their job; it should not require hours of assembly work from your HR team or committee. 
  • Plain language, not jargon. The findings should answer straightforward business questions: What’s working? What’s not? What could be better? And what would it take to fix it? Nobody needs to be impressed by how many code sections an advisor can quote. 
  • No change for the sake of change. The right approach doesn’t start from an assumption that you need a new provider or a plan overhaul. Sometimes the right recommendation is to keep doing what you’re already doing well. 
  • Support through implementation. When changes do make sense, you shouldn’t be handed a to-do list and wished good luck. There is tremendous value  in having the people with the expertise and resources help carry those changes through. 

A quality review enables you to walk away with facts, best practices, and a clear path forward, without unnecessary disruption to your organization or your employees. 

One Advisor, an Entire Team Behind Them 

There’s a reason the best retirement plan support doesn’t rest on a single person’s shoulders. 

A talented individual advisor is still just one person, expected to be a relationship manager, investment specialist, plan administrator, employee educator, project manager, and transition specialist, plus be knowledgeable about ERISA law, all at once. That’s an unrealistic amount to expect of a single person. 

A stronger model puts one advisor at the center of the relationship, someone who can speak to every part of the plan, who is surrounded by dedicated specialists who handle these specific components every day. 

This ensures the client gets the advocacy of a single trusted advisor who owns all communication and responsibility but has the depth of a full team behind them. That combination is hard to beat, and it’s exactly what people investing their hard-earned money  for their retirement years deserve. 

Give Your Plan the Attention It Deserves 

Your employer-sponsored retirement plan is one of the most significant investments your organization makes in its people. It shouldn’t run on unknowns. 

A retirement plan review is the simplest way to replace uncertainty with confidence, whether that means confirming your plan is on track or uncovering opportunities to make it better. The process is low-pressure, requires little from you, and always ends with clarity. 

Don’t wait for a problem to force the conversation. Request a retirement plan review today and find out exactly where your plan stands. 

 

Investment advisory services offered through Rehmann Wealth, a Registered Investment Advisor. Securities offered through Rehmann Financial Network, LLC, member FINRA/SIPC. Insurance Services offered through Rehmann Insurance Group.